Resident Evil just had the best opening weekend in its 24-year history, and Zach Cregger did it by throwing out the thing longtime fans expected most: the games’ actual story. His reboot skips established characters and canon entirely, tells an original tale set during a viral outbreak in Raccoon City, and still opened to $60 million domestic and $108.3 million worldwide. That is a screenwriting decision worth studying, not just a box office headline.
What Cregger actually changed
Every live-action Resident Evil before this one leaned on the games in some way, characters, plot beats, or both. Cregger’s version keeps the setting and the outbreak, but builds a new story around a medical courier caught in the middle of it, played by Austin Abrams. No returning heroes. No fan-service cameos standing in for plot.
That is a bigger swing than it sounds. A franchise reboot usually survives by giving the audience what it already recognizes. Cregger’s script bets the opposite: that a strong original story earns the audience’s trust faster than a familiar one that has already disappointed them twice.
Why that was a real risk
The previous Resident Evil reboot, Welcome to Raccoon City in 2021, tried the opposite approach. It stayed close to the games and still underperformed, closing its run under $42 million worldwide. Fans had already shown that faithfulness alone was not enough to save the franchise.
So walking away from canon on the next attempt was not the safe move. It was a bet that the property’s biggest problem was not disloyalty to the source material, it was weak storytelling. Sony backed that bet with a $75 million budget, the most expensive live-action entry in the series.
The numbers behind the bet
The result: a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes, the highest of any Resident Evil film by a wide margin, and a B+ CinemaScore from opening night audiences. The $60 million domestic opening more than doubled the franchise’s previous record. Global box office trackers now put it on pace to outgross most of the earlier films combined.
It is the same pattern this site covered with this year’s two biggest box office hits: audiences reward a story that is confident about what it wants to be, not one that is trying to please everyone who ever touched the source material.
What this means for adapting existing IP
If you are ever hired to write inside someone else’s franchise, the Resident Evil case gives you a useful test. Ask what the audience actually walked away wanting more of last time: the specific characters, or the feeling the world gave them. Cregger’s script bet on the feeling, survival horror, dread, a ticking clock, and treated the characters as replaceable.
That same logic showed up in how Rockstar built two new protagonists for GTA VI instead of returning to an established one. Big franchises are increasingly choosing new characters over familiar ones, as long as the tone and the world stay recognizable.
The takeaway
Canon is not the thing keeping a franchise alive. Story quality is. Resident Evil spent two decades proving that staying faithful to the games was not enough, and one weekend proving that a confident original script, in the right hands, is. If you are writing inside an existing world, protect the feeling it gives people before you protect the details they already know.
This article is part of the ongoing craft discussion at Frame One. For a full method on developing a first screenplay from the ground up, see The Screenwriting Series.
Leave a Reply